Why the Charismatic Church and the Reformed Church need each other!

Someone recently lent me a book by Martyn Lloyd-Jones entitled What is an Evangelical? Needless to say, it had a profound impact on me.  I found I agreed with most of what the author said, whilst also disagreeing with him on certain points.  In some ‘Reformed’ circles, this man is put on a high pedal stool, which annoys me greatly, however he was a man greatly blessed in ministry and wisdom.  Many thanks to Josh for lending it to me, it has been a great inspiration!

Evangelicalism: Primary and Secondary issues

What is an Evangelical? © ICM books
What is an Evangelical? © ICM books

The whole point of the book (a series of lectures given in 1971), is to define what an Evangelical is; that they are one who focuses on the whole truth of the gospel, not jeopardising the primary issues, such as the Cross and the Resurrection, etc. He also is keen to point out a lot of matters which are not primary issues such as Calvinism, how the Spirit works, baptism, prophetic interpretation etc.… with which a lot of Christians can get carried away with and divided by.

When I read this, I was extremely glad when the author noted the secondary issues that should not get in the way of unity amongst Evangelicals. I would add to this, colour of church doors, the type of worship music that we use, whether or not we have pews, or the version of the Bible that we use. There are so many little divisions that keep us from this unity.  I am also very glad that he notes of primary issues that we must focus on, and that we should be careful of those who vary from us on these primary truths.  The Catholic Church for example, in doctrine on primary truths, varies lot and we must be careful.   However Lloyd-Jones’ view on creation I think can be a red-herring, and a hindrance to real issues. Ultimately, how God created the world is neither here nor there when it comes to salvation. It doesn’t bother me, what bothers me is Jesus and his Word being proclaimed in our land.

Nonetheless, unity in the church is a topic Lloyd-Jones focuses on and I would like to take it even further, that the many denominations need to have further unity. In doctrine we will differ on these secondary issues, but with all our aims in evangelising, in spreading the good news, we must unite, as this infighting is just us letting sin control us.

Doctrine and Feeling: the Balancing Act

Lloyd-Jones attacks both intellectualism and emotionalism in these series of lectures. Both, he feels, hinder the work of the Gospel and our walk with the Lord. He notes that especially those in Reformed circles, if they feel the Spirit and are baptised in the Spirit they feel they have to become Pentecostal, which he states is not the case!  How true is this!  All Christians should welcome such a wonderful gift and should not feel inclined to change denomination because of it!  In this, he notes that there has to be knowledge of doctrine, which warns us of the danger of ecumenicalism.  That because we think we feel the Spirit does not mean that doctrine no longer matters, it does!  That’s why there is still an important divide between Catholics and Protestants, etc… What Lloyd-Jones notes, is that both the Spirit and doctrine are vital for our modern day church.  That either going too far one way will become very dangerous and I totally agree with this.  I will later go into the Reformed-Charismatic movement as a way of reaching the balance, but for now it is important to note that balance is always needed in the church.

Lloyd-Jones notes of the danger of the growing ecumenical movement that he saw rise during his lifetime. As Christians, we need to be careful of sharing with other churches which vary from the primary issues of the gospel.  The Catholic Church and some other denominations need to be kept apart from fellowship for our own good.  How can we share evangelism platforms with those who compromise  on fundamentals?  Share a platform with those who do not believe in a personal relationship with God, who believe in an infallible man called a Pope and pray to Mary? The poor woman would turn in her grave, if only she knew!  I am not saying that there are not Christians amongst the Catholic Church, far be it from me to say such things, but certainly the leadership and structure of the Catholic Church should never be met in fellowship, they are incredibly dangerous.  I sometimes feel as though we think ecumenical movements are the only way to achieve unity.  That idea is wrong, we can have unity in fellowship with our denominations, evangelize together, but we have to recognize our differences and stop trying to water down and compromise on doctrine.

He writes that the church has to be constantly reforming. This is an interesting notion and one that I fully understand.  The church should not be relying on its traditions to survive; it should rather be looking forward, and constantly improving itself, adapting to new challenges and situations, and most importantly continually growing in the Lord.

Reformed and Charismatics: where’s the in-between?

I would know like to move onto an article that discusses unity in an interesting way. The term ‘Reformed Charismatic’ might surprise a few, but I think it is wonderful. By it, we see a church desiring to learn the word, whilst acknowledging the wonderful and powerful work of the Holy Spirit.

If you have read my post on Calvinism, you would know that I am deeply against labels. However, a recent post by the Gospel Coalition really stood out to me. ‘Why Charismatics and Calvinists Need Each Other’. I now aim to explain what the author means by the term ‘Reformed Charismatic’ and why I indeed agree with him.

To me, in simplistic terms, Reformed (Calvinist) churches focus on doctrine but can tread into problems with intellectualism, whilst Charismatic churches focuses on the Spirit, but can tread in dangerous waters regarding emotionalism. Both broadly describe themselves as ‘Evangelical.’ There is no balance in either of these camps. Having emotion and doctrine is no bad thing; God has given us emotions that allow us to express ourselves when words cannot.  God has given us doctrine to grow closer to Him.

The church needs to embrace both these. The Spirit is real, the gifts God give are real, and God is unchanging, so why would he suddenly withdraw them from us?  The gifts are wonderful, and experiencing God is a fantastic experience that can stir our heart to praise Him more. Interestingly, many ultra-Reformed-types love the writing of Puritans such as Jonathan Edwards, however, it can be noted that he describes of incredible encounters and experiences with God, the like of which some would denounce today.

At the same time, doctrinal knowledge is needed. To keep us from wandering from God, to help us know more of him and to really grow as his children.  To generalise the church here, we have gone to one extreme or the other, rather than desiring both.  We have become scared of doctrine, or we have become scared of accepting the Spirit, of losing control and letting God use us.  What we need to be is unafraid and let God work; we need to desire to learn more of him, whilst we long for his spirit to fill us, to overwhelm us, so that like the old Puritan John Flavel who knew ‘more of heaven from one experience with the Lord than all the books and sermons he had ever read’; or as D.L. Moody, “Stay thy hand Lord! Or the vessel will break!”

The dangers of both extremes are real, between stiff-upper-lip hermit hyper-Calvinists and bewildered Charismatics living for weekly-experiences and healings, perpetually worried about losing their salvation or grieving the Spirit.

Even in our worship we must see a balance. Now I do aim to do an article of worship later on in more detail; but even in our worship we must reform.  In many Reformed circles, the organ and hymns are seen as the right way, that praising God can only be done this way; it keeps the emotions under control and is right and proper.  In Charismatic circles, having the most up-to-date music, with choruses, and a variety of instruments is seen as the best way to praise God.  That God can only work when music is used and that music is the only way we can praise God can sometimes be the message shown.  Now both are naïve in their understanding of God, but both can be good forms of worship.  To the Reformed, I say, do not box God up and tell him what proper worship is, and do not be scared of your emotions, neither should you hinder the use of God’s gifts he has given people, nor not allow other instruments or new songs into the church.  To the Charismatic church I say, don’t let your emotions go unchecked, don’t be afraid of the old stuff and don’t get carried away by the music alone.  We need authentic worship that comes from our heart.  If both types of churches embraced each other’s style, with an authentic heart then maybe we would really see God work more and more!

Is what I’m saying ecumenical? Hardly!  Churches will always have disagreements over secondary issues, but when it comes to Evangelical Reformed and Charismatic churches, we agree on so much, and the denominations agree on so much.  By being a Reformed Charismatic, perhaps we can move to a position where the churches can come together to evangelise and fellowship more, presenting a unified Body of Christ, resplendent and effective in evangelism, ‘salt and light’.  It will keep us aware of the doctrinal truth of the Bible, and thus aware of heresies such as the Roman Catholic Church, whilst engaging with so many more churches around us.  It will allow us to have a church that is filled with the Spirit, and one that is strong in the word of God.

Concluding thoughts

We must learn to come together in unity; we must immediately pray for this unity and get rid of the animosity in the church and we must learn to accept our differences. May our prayer be the prayer of Jesus in Gethsemane as John 17: 22-23 states ‘I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one— I in them and you in me—so that they may be brought to complete unity. Then the world will know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me. May we be like Christ as Philippians 2:1-5 says Therefore if you have any encouragement from being united with Christ, if any comfort from his love, if any common sharing in the Spirit, if any tenderness and compassion, then make my joy complete by being like-minded, having the same love, being one in spirit and of one mind. Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves, not looking to your own interests but each of you to the interests of the others.’

Therefore to conclude, I think Lloyd-Jones’ lectures in What is an Evangelical? are as relevant today as they were then.  We need to see the dangers of certain movements, and of the liberal churches that are around.  We however, must move away from our extremes of intellectualism and emotionalism, and focus once again on the Gospel truth.  We need to embrace the Spirit, long for the baptism of the Spirit, for the gifts, whilst also having a strong knowledge of the biblical truths.  We need to be accepting of our differences, except when Gospel fundamentals are impinged on.  Although I am wary of labels, perhaps calling ourselves a Reformed Charismatic is a start in bringing a unity between Reformed and Charismatic churches, whilst also bringing together the gospel truths once more.  May you be blessed and may God burn in your hearts brothers and sisters!

Reflection on the US Election: No need to worry!

It has been a week since the people of America democratically voted in Donald Trump to become their 45th President of the United States.  Was I disappointed?  Undoubtedly!  Did I panic? No!  In this short blog post I aim to show you that there is no need to worry about such things!

Once the news broke, social media seem to almost explode. People were posting that it was the end of the world; that anyone who voted Trump was a bigot, a racist, sexist etc.…and hate and snobbery were unleashed in one massive go.  It was crazy, Christians and non-Christians were panicking, were making assumptions of people they had never met and were frankly terrified.  Now, rather than being all high and mighty about your political stand point, take time to listen to others, tackle the issue from their stand point.  Trump may not be my chosen candidate, but there is no need to worry.

So why do we not need to worry? Well I heard a sermon on that talked a bit about this recently.  The answer is quite straight forward.  As Christians, we do not need to fear or worry because God is sovereign.  He is a far bigger power than any president.  Sometimes in life we wonder why things don’t go our way or feel overcome by the difficulties in life.  But remember God is bigger than any of those problems.  Maybe he is using them to rebuild you as a better follower of Jesus, to trust him more, to grow in all of his ways.  God cannot be shocked, he knew Trump would be president; he is in and out of time!  He knows what will happen, so give your worry to him, rest in him. He says countless times in the Bible ‘Do not Fear’, we have nothing to fear if we are one of his children!  Those words were important for the early church and they are important today in political uncertainty.  And if you were a Clinton supporter then do not worry that even Christians voted for Trump.  They have their reasons, do not be so quick to judge, but know that God is above all of them!

We do not need to worry because we can make an impact on society by loving our neighbour. For some reason, we feel that only the big politicians can change society, that they can make all things good.  We put way to much trust into a single politician.  If you liked Obama, well he had problems, if you supported Clinton; she had a load of problems, just as many as Trump does.  Putting our entire trust and faith in politics is dangerous and messy.  As Christians, we can make a difference by spreading the word, by living out the word and by showing love.  No not a wishy washy kind of love, by a love that wants to see the poor and needy helped, a love that reaches to those who we disagree with, a love that keeps us balanced, and a love that shines for all to see.  So before you start ranting on Facebook or social media, take a step back, look to God, know that he is in control, that you have nothing to fear, not even death.  So start listening to those around you, whoever they may be; do not be so quick to judge, take time to understand even if they do not with you.

This is not just for politics. We need not worry about anything.  Of course that is easier said than done, and we are but human, but when worry and troubles find you, take a step back and know God is sovereign over all.  Whether this is with school work, essays, stress at work, family troubles, remember that all things work together for our good, and that Jesus is with you every step of the way.

For us, our focus point should always be Jesus and the cross. When we get lost in the troubles of the world, look up to Jesus because he knows your pain and fear.   Our focus point is never a political ideology or secondary doctrinal issues.  Our focus is Jesus and only him.  So when the worries of this world take their hold, remember Jesus and just how awesome he is.

I was just about to post, when this song by Chris Tomlin came to mind, so let me end with it, ‘Fear not’.  Rather apt no?

In Christ, and in love


What is Christian Socialism? Have Christians always been Socialists?

In this article, I aim to explain the origins of ‘Christian Socialism’. I will attempt to analyse its basis on Biblical principles, and relate the massive effect it has had on history.  I will mainly focus on Early Modern-Modern examples of this.

From the Levellers to the socialists in Parliament today, Christians have been at the forefront of social reform. Following in the footsteps of Jesus, Christians from all political backgrounds have been heavily involved in helping the poor and sick in society; moreover ‘Christian socialists’ have been important reformers.

Before I start, let me define the term ‘Christian Socialism’. The Encyclopaedia Britannica states that “The term was generally associated with the demands of Christian activists for a social [programme] of political and economic action on behalf of all individuals, impoverished or wealthy…was used in contradistinction to laissez-faire individualism.”  When we talk about this, we do not mean Marxism, or Communism.  They are ideals that are unreachable and are in fact quite dangerous to the average person on the street.  Christian Socialism is therefore about helping the poor, helping the rich, and above all combating the individualism mentality, so prevalent today.

I consider myself a so-called ‘Christian socialist’, and believe that Christians have been called to be ‘social warriors’, fighting to help the lives of the poor and vulnerable.

Common objections to Christian Socialism

Some use the argument that these earthly needs will soon pass, this world is not important as the next (which is true), to argue against the political work of Christians. But to this, I say, look to the Bible, what did Jesus do and preach?  He looked after the poor; he gave to the poor, and ultimately gave them the ultimate gift – His life.  He healed the sick and stood up for the vulnerable. He didn’t just give the blind, lame and sick the Gospel, he healed them too.  He had little care for money, or for material needs (which is something the church seems to care too much about today).

Another argument against getting involved politically is that, Jesus never supported any political institution; his focus was on the word, and on those around him. That is indeed true, and in the modern world as Christians, we can have a massive impact outside politics, but we can help inside politics too and we must take action to help all those in need.  We shouldn’t be driven by political allegiances and divided by political divisions, but by a strong desire to help, and thus being that light.  Personally, I couldn’t give a monkeys as to what political party you belong to (though I think the extremes of either left or right should be avoided), but as Christians we should do our upmost to help people. Christian Socialism is a means to do this.

Christian Socialism is not just for Parliament, it is how we interact with the world – seeing that it needs that light, and thus trying to help all those around us.   It recognises that Capitalism can be evil, rooted in greed, idolatry and oppression and that the rich get richer and the poor poorer.  Some may think that I am suggesting that we must bring down the system, we must revolt!  I am saying neither of this, but rather suggesting that Capitalism has its faults – it is a product of a sinful world.  Sometimes Christians can excuse themselves, stating that God has put them in that place so it doesn’t matter, but it does!  Sin has put people in different places, and we must tackle the evils, to help those around us!  It is our duty as Christians, to actually make an impact; we are not to be idle and be lazy, but to be active!  The world idolises money, status and fame, as Christians we shouldn’t want any of that.


Christian Socialism – Biblical basis?

Before I go into the history of the movement, let us examine the Scriptures and see what they say. James 5: 1-6 (in the context of rich oppressors) says:

Come now, you rich, weep and howl for the miseries that are coming upon you. Your riches have rotted and your garments are moth-eaten. Your gold and silver have rusted, and their rust will be evidence against you and will eat your flesh like fire. You have laid up for treasure for the last days. Behold, the wages of the labourers who mowed your fields, which you have kept back by fraud, cry out; and the cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord of hosts. You have lived on the earth in luxury and in pleasure; you have fattened your hearts in a day of slaughter

James isn’t holding back here is he! The rich and the wealthy that store it all for themselves will reap what they sow.  Those who oppress will be judged.  This warning should be taken seriously by Christians, and by no means should we be happy with a system that does this.  The Old Testament has a variety of verses that tell us not to be idle, but to do good and help people. Isaiah 1:15-17 says:

Even though you make many prayers, I will not listen; your hands are full of blood…cease to do evil, learn to do good; seek justice, correct oppression; defend the fatherless, plead for the widow

And Psalm 82:

Give justice to the weak and the fatherless; maintain the right of the afflicted and the destitute. Rescue the weak and the needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked

And Psalm 112:

Blessed is the man who fears the Lord, who greatly delights in his commandments!…He has distributed freely, he has given to the poor; his righteousness endures forever; his horn is exalted in honour

The Bible certainly doesn’t suggest that we should be rising in revolution, bringing down the state and living on communes. We definitely shouldn’t be militant; but it does suggest a change of heart, one that seeks to help the poor, that hates oppression, loves justice, does good and cares for all.

So far, we have seen that there are passages in Scripture that show Christian Socialism is based on Biblical principles. The Early Church can be argued as an example of ‘Christian Socialism’ in practice.  Acts 2-5 promotes a life of sharing and giving.  Whilst doing research I notice that some sites, such as The Gospel Coalition seem to suggest otherwise.

I do think their arguments are really hazy and seem to me, they are trying to make excuses. There also seems to be confusion between Socialism and Communism.  There are many strands of Socialism, for example. Christian Socialism is one of these many strands.  The Early Church can be seen from these passages to share what they had, there was no class structure either.  They were united in their one desire for God.  The Church were being different, it shows us how we should live.  A desire for private property is worldly.  Yes, there is nothing wrong with owning a house, don’t get me wrong, but if we cling to these, if we are not prepared to give them up at a moments notice, then we are doing it wrong.


History of Christian Socialism

Earlier forms of Christian Socialism include radical dissent movements in the Middle Ages (the Peasants’ Revolt, John Wycliffe and Lollards), Levellers and Diggers in the time of the English civil war (1642-1651), and the Corresponding Societies of the 1790s as well as several prominent figures of the Victorian era. Remember none of these were revolutionary movements, when we use the term ‘revolt’, it means in simple terms that the people wanted to be heard and ‘revolting’ was a way of getting their grievances addressed properly by the central government, not a full-blown revolution.  Let us now jump to the 17th century.  It’s a period I know fairly well.  There were certainly socialists before this time and Christians were making a big impact socially before the 1600s, but for sake of space and time, let us look at the Levellers.  For a greater look into this, do read my post I made for the Christians on the Left.

One of the many pamphlets made by the Levellers, whom argued for rights for all men, and equality in courts

The Levellers have often been looked down upon by certain Christians, mainly as they opposed certain factions within the Puritan movement, notably Parliamentarians. When I discuss Puritanism, I effectively mean the middle class during the middle of the seventeenth century, those in the Church of England and those who were in power.  Levellers argued for votes for all men, and social justice, they wanted a fairer society for all.  The Parliamentarians during the civil war, under Cromwell, crushed their protests; their ideas of social reform threatened those in power.  They were a mass movement, and desired change through their petitions, pamphlets and protests.  They weren’t revolutionaries; they were just political reformers who were seen as a threat to the established order and Church, kind of like how the Wesleys were seen a century later. That dreaded word – change.  They were before their time and looked to the Bible for answers.  They can be a great inspiration for all Christians and probably the first real ‘Christian Socialists’! It is interesting to note that many of the leaders of the Leveller movement were ex-Puritans and their following were the poor.  As stated, to me Puritanism was generally a middle class movement, whilst Levellers included everyone, regardless of class or position and were therefore more inclusive. One argument made by them and that Diggers (True Levellers) was who actually introduced a class system?  For it was not God surely? But man’s desire to rule over one another.

Although this image is Victorian. The argument on class was made by Levellers and the Diggers. It wasn’t an attack on class, but made note that all should be treated equally

Christians should be proud of the actions of the Levellers and for what they stood for, we need to be inclusive like they were and fight for social justice.  If you are someone who follows many of the Puritan writers, then you still should not be against what the Levellers stood for.  Yes they did conflict a lot with the Puritans, but it is worth looking into what the Levellers actually wanted, for yourself. Find out; see if they were a positive force in English politics.



An image of Wesley preaching to the masses. His message was a message to all, and did not focus on class

In the eighteenth century, we can note the rise of Methodism led by Charles and John Wesley. This movement along with the actions taken by key preachers like George Whitfield and Howell Harris has many similarities to Christian Socialism.  In the local prayer meetings and services, there was unlikely to be any issue of class.  Both women and men, poor and rich gathered together to worship.  They also started many Sunday schools to help educate the poor children to read and write.  Methodism promoted a universal fund where those in need to go too if they were in hard times, this can be seen to be a biblical principal as found in 2 Corinthians 8, no one was to go needy.  The church was meant to look after its flock, look after the people in its area and therefore it was to play an important role in the community for everyone.  In fact when the agricultural and industrial revolution took place in England, it was the Methodists who pressed manufacturing owners to treat their workers well and to feed and pay them fairly.  Although we should never consider Methodism as a political movement, it is argued that it prevented revolution in England (compared with the turmoil across the Channel), as it helped quell the concerns of the poor, even if the establishment believed they were trying to stir up revolution by breaking class divides and the like.  Methodism therefore was a movement for everyone, but focused its attention to the needs of the poor, especially their greatest need.

Written by one of the early Christian Socialists.

If we fast-forward to the 19th century, we will find a vast movement of Christian socialists, some of whom were the founders of the Fabian society, which would latter help in the creation of the Labour Party.   Three founding fathers of what we now call ‘Christian Socialism’ in its modern sense were Fredrick Maurice, John Ludlow and Charles Kingsley.  According to Dr Andrzej Diniejko, ‘They believed that the Christian Gospel contains the key to the social question, particularly in its teaching of the brotherhood of man. The chief mission of the Christian Socialists was to win back the workingmen to the Church. Christian Socialism meant for them social, cross-class co-operation and partnership under the leadership of the Church.’ These three men wrote many tracts and publications.  They advocated ‘the moral regeneration of individuals as a means of alleviating acute social problems.’  They appealed to the charity of the rich, to give to the poor.

A book which shows the importance of Christian Socialism in the 19th century. Worth a read!!

Victorian Christian Socialism, like today in many respects, was not against the class system. It did not want to bring the whole system down, nor did it want to fight the rich.  What it wanted to do was transform peoples’ attitudes, to fight the injustices in the world, and to be a true light in a dark place.  It is clear that these Christian Socialists were against unrestrained laissez faire Capitalism.  It is also clear that they ‘emphasised the collective responsibility of society to deal with economic problems. The Victorian Christian Socialists contributed to adult education, the co-operative movement, friendly societies and the Labour movement. Christian Socialism placed a greater emphasis upon moral and social requirements of human life than other strands of Victorian socialism.’

The social gospel which was aimed at improving the lives of the poor. It is our duty as Christians to help the vulnerable, and the gospel tells us this

In the twentieth century, we see movements towards the social gospel. The Social Gospel as it become known tried to apply Christian ethics to social problems, such as such as economic inequality, poverty, alcoholism, crime, racial tensions, slums, unclean environment, child labour, inadequate labour unions, poor schools, and the danger of war.  Leading Evangelical lights such as John Scott have argued that this movement desperately needs to be revived today.  Although it has links to the ecumenical movement, the social gospel is something many churches have lacked for a number of years.  The Bible is meant to give life and hope, it calls us to proclaim to word, but it also calls us to help the poor and needy, something which we severely lack today.

A Campaign slogan by the CoL. Arguing that all should pay tax. Their campaigns range from stopping Sunday trading to housing. Their aim is to help the poor and vulnerable in society

If we fast forward to today, we note that Christian Socialists are still a force in England, notably within the Labour party as the Christians on the Left.  They advocate a fairer tax system, but also no trading on Sundays and state that we must disagree well with other political forces such as the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats.  I am a strong advocate of disagreeing well!  After all, there are Christians on both sides of the political spectrum, who believe that their stance will benefit people more.  I don’t doubt that we all share values of Christian Socialism, and even when we find ourselves in our different political tribes, our primarily focus is always the Kingdom of God.

Christian socialism is not a directly-Biblical notion, but its values are. Its use throughout history has been to help people, to fight injustice.  It differs from other socialism as it does not want to bring down the establishment, rather reform it via the works of the gospel.  Christians have a duty to help people, by getting involved in politics. We can achieve this. However there is often talk of ‘Left versus Right’.  This is not how we as Christians should tackle this issue.  We should love people of different political backgrounds, get passionate about what we believe, warn people of dangerous political followings, but also remember that Christians can be Labour or Conservative, and still have a desire to help people.


Concluding thoughts

To conclude, Christian socialism is important to me as I believe it is a way where we can make an impact in people’s lives. Some will disagree and believe in a more Conservative approach, which is fine as well.  What should be the focus is a desire to make a difference no matter what our political leaning is.  We need to focus on the Kingdom, to love one another, and spread the Gospel of our Glorious risen Lord. There should be no hate in Christians of Conservatives or Labour, that is wrong, and if you do hate…cut it out now!  Christian socialism has had an enormous impact in the world’s history and impacted the lives of countless millions.  The values of this are what Jesus has called us to do, love our neighbour, reach out to the poor and outcasts in society and be that light in this dark world.

God is not a capitalist, he’s not a socialist, he’s not labour, he is not a conservative, democrat of republican. God is not to be put into a political box, he is on no political party side.  This is why even though my personal political beliefs label me as a Christian Socialist, I know that politics is not the be all and end all, we are meant to do his will whatever party is in power and we must work with those from all political backgrounds in order to help all classes in society.  God has his own agenda, and loves his people whatever their political agenda, labour/conservative even Liberal Democrats!

Therefore let us disagree well with our brothers and sisters. Capitalism has its many flaws, and has left many poor and needy behind.  It’s our job to help those and care for them, and we all have our different thoughts on how this is done.  For me, answers can be found in Christian Socialism, for others it is not.  Again let us disagree well.  Christian Socialism has a rich and powerful history, God has worked in it for his own agenda, like he has worked in the conservative movements.  We have our different political tribes, but we all belong to one Kingdom, our Father’s.